|
|
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdaanat|871(m) amendment}} | | {{nman|isda|2002|871(m) amendment}} |
| [[Section 871(m)]] of the [[Internal Revenue Code]] clamps down on dirty foreigners avoiding [[withholding tax]] for dividends on US [[Share - Equity Derivatives Provision|equities]]. Previously, US dividend [[Withholding tax|withholding]] did not apply to returns on notional principal contracts and instruments linked to underlying US equities.
| |
| | |
| That’s all changed now.
| |
| | |
| The new regulations will establish up to a 30% [[withholding tax]] on foreign investors on dividend-equivalent payments under [[equity derivative|equity derivatives]]. There are a wide range of products that fall into this camp including [[swap]]s, [[option]]s, [[future]]s, [[convertible bond|convertible debt]], [[structured note|structured notes]] and other customised derivative where the ...
| |
| | |
| ===Beware of {{tag|Greeks}}===
| |
| ... [[delta]] (see what I did there?) against the underlying stock is .08 or greater.
| |
| | |
| {{delta}}
| |
| | |
| The calculation is cumulative so even if the delta threshold isn’t met in one transaction, it may be as a result a connected transaction.
| |
| | |
| It applies from 1 January 2017.
| |
| | |
| ===So does that mean I can bin all this [[hypothetical broker-dealer]] nonsense?===
| |
| [[There’s no bright line test]], obviously.
| |
| | |
| Since [[871(m)]] means that {{tag|WHT}} is now applied on [[high-delta equity derivative]]s in the same way it applies to physical cash trades, the [[recharacterisation]] risk is surely less fraught now, isn’t it? do we really care whether the counterparty controls the hedge? Can we therefore get rid of that tiresome “[[hypothetical broker-dealer]]” language, which so mightily confuses many counterparties, and just reference the actual hedge liquidation price as the closing price of the derivative?
| |
| | |
| No, because [[871(m)]] does not apply to all underliers that might feature in a [[synthetic equity]] transaction. and also because there are [[WHT]] and [[stamp duty]] regimes in other jurisdictions ([[SDRT]] on UK equities for example) where a derivative acheives preferential tax treatment over a cash equity trade.
| |
| | |
| But you’re right: the [[hypothetical broker-dealer]] business ''is'' [[Don’t take a piece of paper to a knife fight|ridiculous]].
| |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *[[ISDA 2015 Section 871(m) Protocol]]
| |
| *[[Synthetic prime brokerage]]
| |
| *[[Don’t take a piece of paper to a knife fight]]
| |
| | |
| {{c|tax}}
| |