Security financial collateral arrangement: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Not a title transfer financial collateral arrangement. All is explained in our article on the Financial collateral Directive. Fly, you fools!")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Not a [[title transfer financial collateral arrangement]]. All is explained in our article on the [[Financial collateral Directive]].  
{{a|security|}}A [[security financial collateral arrangement]] — to specialists, an “'''[[SFCA]]'''” — is, well, it’s ''not'' a [[title transfer financial collateral arrangement]] (“'''[[TTCA]]'''”), but rather one where [[collateral]] is transferred by way of possession only, where the receiver has a [[security interest]] and may even have  [[legal title]] but down not have [[beneficial ownership]] of the asset in question ... buuuuuut if [[rehypothecation]] is allowed, may be able to sell it anyway. Confused? Don’t be. Well, ''do'' be, but don’t feel ashamed about it. All is explained in our article on the [[Financial Collateral Directive]]. And, if not in that one, in our section on [[cognitive dissonance]].


Fly, you fools!
Fly, you fools!
Or, check out our [[NY VM CSA Anatomy|NY law Variation Margin CSA Anatomy]].
But, really, you should fly. Fools.
{{sa}}
*[[Pledge]]
*[[Collateral]]
*[[Rehypothecation]]
*{{CSA}}