83,164
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{aifmdanat|DR99}}") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{a|aifmd|}}Delegated Regulation {{aifmdprov|DR99}} relates to the {{aifmdprov|depositary}}’s obligation to segregate custody assets. | ||
In the main {{aifmdprov|DR99}} is of scant interest to [[prime broker]]s, though the {{aifmdprov|depositary}} might insist on copying screeds of the regulation out and popping it into the custody delegation contract. This is an understandable instinct, but a misguided one which you must all the same resist, for the simple reason that ''regulations change''. Even EU regulations. By all means refer to the obligations under {{aifmdprov|DR99}} as in force [[from time to time]], or something similarly laborious, as lopng as it tracks what the actual regulatory requirement is, for the time being, not what it was eight years ago when you signed your contract. | |||
An [[Negotiator|assiduous pedant]]<ref>I was surprised about this, too, but you do occasionally come across them negotiating prime brokerage documents.</ref> might also argue that {{aifmdprov|DR99}} doesn’t actually impose obligations, ''[[per se]]'', on the [[delegate]] [[sub-custodian]], but only on the {{aifmdprov|depositary}}, so the delegate should not have to give these reps, or agree to be subject to these regulations at all. | |||
You have the chance to do the whole world a favour here, by not being that guy. | |||
{{ref}} |