Semantic code project: next steps: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
{{tablebottom}}
{{tablebottom}}


I also suspect there are some standard form provisions that are worth rending as standard objects (rather than constructing them out of canonical forms) — basically “boilerplate” clauses which are semantically complex, but unitary in the context of a contract (for example, the [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act]] clause).
I also suspect there are some standard form provisions that are worth rending as standard objects (rather than constructing them out of canonical forms) — basically “boilerplate” clauses which are semantically complex, but unitary in the context of a contract (for example, the [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999|Third Party Rights]] clause).