82,882
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
My hunch is that there is, and the apparently infinite complexity of legal drafting in fact subsists at a lower, syntactical level. For example, the “object” proposition is: | My hunch is that there is, and the apparently infinite complexity of legal drafting in fact subsists at a lower, syntactical level. For example, the “object” proposition is: | ||
{{ | {{quote| | ||
{{red|[[code obligation|obligation]] [}} | |||
:{{de|label}} {{{label}}} | :{{de|label}} {{{label}}} | ||
:{{de|who}} {{{who}}} | :{{de|who}} {{{who}}} | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
:{{de|how}} {{{how}}} | :{{de|how}} {{{how}}} | ||
:{{de|when}} {{{when}}} | :{{de|when}} {{{when}}} | ||
:{{de|condition}} {{{condition}}}{{red|]}} | :{{de|condition}} {{{condition}}}{{red|]}} }} | ||
And the difference between a complex obligation and a simple one comes in the articulation of each of the objects in side it. So, compare: | And the difference between a complex obligation and a simple one comes in the articulation of each of the objects in side it. So, compare: | ||
{{tabletop}} | {{tabletop}} | ||
!style="width: | !style="width: 25%"|ISDA 2002 | ||
!style="width: | !style="width: 75%"|2002 Code | ||
{{aligntop}} | {{aligntop}} | ||
| | | |