Semantic code project: next steps: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


My hunch is that there is, and the apparently infinite complexity of legal drafting in fact subsists at a lower, syntactical level. For example, the “object” proposition is:
My hunch is that there is, and the apparently infinite complexity of legal drafting in fact subsists at a lower, syntactical level. For example, the “object” proposition is:
{{tabletop}}{{red|[[code obligation|obligation]] [}}
{{quote|
{{red|[[code obligation|obligation]] [}}
:{{de|label}} {{{label}}}
:{{de|label}} {{{label}}}
:{{de|who}} {{{who}}}  
:{{de|who}} {{{who}}}  
Line 22: Line 23:
:{{de|how}} {{{how}}}
:{{de|how}} {{{how}}}
:{{de|when}} {{{when}}}
:{{de|when}} {{{when}}}
:{{de|condition}} {{{condition}}}{{red|]}}
:{{de|condition}} {{{condition}}}{{red|]}} }}
{{tablebottom}}


And the difference between a complex obligation and a simple one comes in the articulation of each of the objects in side it. So, compare:
And the difference between a complex obligation and a simple one comes in the articulation of each of the objects in side it. So, compare:


{{tabletop}}
{{tabletop}}
!style="width: 30%"|ISDA 2002
!style="width: 25%"|ISDA 2002
!style="width: 70%"|2002 Code
!style="width: 75%"|2002 Code
{{aligntop}}
{{aligntop}}
|
|