Seventh law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
This law is routinely ignored, at great cost to the poor [[subject matter expert]]s on whose heads [[tedium]] inevitable rains down but also, gratifyingly, on the [[software as a service]] vendor whose bright<ref>Not bright.</ref> ideas they hawk to middle managers in the legal [[chief operating office]].  
This law is routinely ignored, at great cost to the poor [[subject matter expert]]s on whose heads [[tedium]] inevitable rains down but also, gratifyingly, on the [[software as a service]] vendor whose bright<ref>Not bright.</ref> ideas they hawk to middle managers in the legal [[chief operating office]].  


Any innovation that, for example, injects a new [[dialog box]], however well-intended — was there ever a [[dialog box]] that wasn’t well-intended? — into an existing process violates this principle.
Any innovation that, for example, injects a new [[dialog box]], however well-intended — was there ever a [[dialog box]] that ''wasn’t'' well-intended? — into an existing process violates this principle.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}