Severability: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
There is an element, too, of the lady protesting too much here: why would you enter a contract if you thought part of it might be illegal? What kind of operation are you running?  
There is an element, too, of the lady protesting too much here: why would you enter a contract if you thought part of it might be illegal? What kind of operation are you running?  


If the choice is between blindly allocating unforeseeable losses at the start of the relationship with a [[severability]] clause, and hoping the parties can be adult enough to come together in good faith to sort out a compromise as and when the unforeseeable becomes a reality later — trusting each other, in other words, to [[Be a good egg|be good eggs]] and [[Non mentula esse|not dicks]] — then the [[JC[]] knows where he’d rather be, and who he would rather be trading with.
If the choice is between blindly allocating unforeseeable losses at the start of the relationship with a [[severability]] clause, and hoping the parties can be adult enough to come together in good faith to sort out a compromise as and when the unforeseeable becomes a reality later — trusting each other, in other words, to [[Be a good egg|be good eggs]] and [[Non mentula esse|not dicks]] — then the [[JC]] knows where he’d rather be, and who he would rather be trading with.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Illegality]]
*[[Illegality]]
*[[Bonum ovum esse]]
*[[Bonum ovum esse]]