Shareholder: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:


=====If shareholders really want to beautify the inner city, they can do it themselves=====
=====If shareholders really want to beautify the inner city, they can do it themselves=====
We assume shareholders are people with disposable income, and they have chosen to this sum into this company for the purpose of generating a return. If they wanted to donate to Oxfam, they could. It is not the company to second guess the moral priorities of its shareholding. As mentioned above, in all respect but the single one of the aspiration for a maximum return, the shareholders interests are entirely opaque, and certainly conflicting. There will be democrats and republicans, vegans and carnivores, wets and dries on the share register. The executive cannot pander to these conflicting proclivities.{{sa}}
We assume shareholders are people with disposable income, and they have chosen to this sum into this company for the purpose of generating a return. If they wanted to donate to Oxfam, they could. It is not the company to second guess the moral priorities of its shareholding. As mentioned above, in all respect but the single one of the aspiration for a maximum return, the shareholders interests are entirely opaque, and certainly conflicting. There will be democrats and republicans, vegans and carnivores, wets and dries on the share register. The executive cannot pander to these conflicting proclivities.
{{sa}}
*[[Stakeholder]]
*[[Stakeholder]]
*[[Equities]]  
*[[Equities]]  
Line 42: Line 43:
*[[Equity Derivatives Anatomy]]
*[[Equity Derivatives Anatomy]]
*[[Stock Lending]]
*[[Stock Lending]]
{{Ref}}