Shubtill v Director of Public Prosecutions: Difference between revisions

Shubtill v Director of Public Prosecutions (view source)

204 bytes removed , 18 October 2022

no edit summary

82,890

edits

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 The defendant’s appeal is unusual so I shall take the unusual step of setting it out in full.
-===The soup===
-It was [[common ground]] that the soup was tomato flavoured, and manufactured by the Heinz company of Pennsylvania, but the parties have disagree sharply on the significance of this fact.