82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
2022: Oct 24 {{right|{{Cocklecarrot}}}} | 2022: Oct 24 {{right|{{Cocklecarrot}}}} | ||
{{smallcaps|Appeal}} against the conviction of [[Ernest Shubtill]], the appellant, for the assault with an edible weapon of [[Violet Elizabeth Botts]]. The appellant was convicted on 17 October 2022, at the London & Middx Assizes.}} | |||
''Contract — Licence — Implied Licence — Whether existence of Implied Licence operates as justification for assault — Criminal Justice Act 1983 — Reasonableness — [[Officious bystander]] — Objectivity of test — Inherent subjectivity of objectivity'' | ''Contract — Licence — Implied Licence — Whether existence of Implied Licence operates as justification for assault — Criminal Justice Act 1983 — Reasonableness — [[Officious bystander]] — Objectivity of test — Inherent subjectivity of objectivity'' | ||
Dame Marjorie Wrigley, K.C. for the appellant <br> | Dame Marjorie Wrigley, K.C. for the appellant <br> |