Signal-to-noise ratio: Difference between revisions

Signal-to-noise ratio (view source)

Revision as of 10:41, 29 August 2020

120 bytes added , 29 August 2020

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

83,159

edits

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ::{{author|W. E. Deming}}
-In Deming’s fashionable quote, one can lay a great deal of responsibility for the dogmatic madness our age.
+At the foot of Deming’s fashionable quote, one can lay a great deal of responsibility for the dogmatic madness our age.
 That it is woven into Dominic Cummings lanyard might tell you something.
-For if we we take it as a given that, to the best of our knowledge, the information content of the universe is infinite, and if we also recognise as as a truism that the amount of data collected racket or indeed generated closed bracket by homo sapiens to the point of reading is finite, then it follows that the total value of data in which Deming would have us trust is, mathematically, nil.
+For if we we take it as a given that, to the best of our knowledge, the information content of the universe, through all time and space is infinite, and if we also recognise as a truism that the data collected (or indeed generated) by homo sapiens to the point of reading is finite, then it follows that the total value of data in which Deming would have us trust is, mathematically, nil.
-And that is before one considers the apparent quality of the data we have gathered — we hear 99% of it originates in the internet age, so a good portion is cat videos and hot takes on [[Twitter]] — in its own terms. But let us leave the the playing banality of our own age to one side.
+And that is before one considers the apparent quality of the data we have gathered — we hear 99% of it originates in the internet age, so a good portion is cat videos and hot takes on [[Twitter]] — in its own terms. But leave the the banality of our age to one side — we don't need it to make out the argument, and I'm sure a lot of those people on Twitter think they are very clever.
-In any case, if we transcend our meagre hermeneutic bubbles, the signal-to-noise ratio is infinitesimal.
+In any case, if we transcend our meagre hermeneutic bubbles, the signal-to-noise ratio of our data is infinitesimal.
 Just on that statistic you might wonder what is so wrong with God. But human beings are pattern-seeking machines. We don’t take the data as we see it cold, and fashion objective axioms from it, carving nature at its joints: we bring our idiosyncratic prisons and pre-existing cognitive structures to it and willfully create suitable patterns from it to support our convictions. This is not a criticism, but an observation. This is the doom our incarcerate race endures.