83,050
edits
Space-tedium continuum: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{A|g|450px|center|The carvature of the space-tedium continuum yesterday, between a positively charged [[carve-in and a negatively charged carve-out...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
But the relationship between space and tedium has not, until recently, been explored. Pioneering jurisprudo-physicist [[Otto Büchstein]] first proposed that it was not space, nor time, but ''[[tedium]]'' that was the constant in the legal universe, and his paper — six hundred and forty-three pages of it, needless to say, five hundred and ninety-seven of which were [[assumption]]s and [[qualification]]s — has opened a number of new subfields in the cosmology of the law. | But the relationship between space and tedium has not, until recently, been explored. Pioneering jurisprudo-physicist [[Otto Büchstein]] first proposed that it was not space, nor time, but ''[[tedium]]'' that was the constant in the legal universe, and his paper — six hundred and forty-three pages of it, needless to say, five hundred and ninety-seven of which were [[assumption]]s and [[qualification]]s — has opened a number of new subfields in the cosmology of the law. | ||
One follows [[Büchstein]]’s own hypothesis, which he derived from his earlier paper, that space-tedium is not flat, as was traditionally supposed, but twisted into other, unobserved dimensions of torpor. This phenomenon, which he called the ''[[carvature]]'' of space-tedium, was first observed in a series of concatenated [[carve-out]]s and [[carve-in]]s to the professional indemnity insurance policy he was obliged to take out for his own practice. | One follows [[Büchstein]]’s own hypothesis, which he derived from his earlier paper, that space-tedium is not flat, as was traditionally supposed, but twisted into other, unobserved dimensions of torpor. This phenomenon, which he called the ''[[carvature]]'' of [[space-tedium]], was first observed in a series of concatenated [[carve-out]]s and [[carve-in]]s to the professional indemnity insurance policy he was obliged to take out for his own practice. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||