83,357
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Include a {{isdaprov|Hierachy of Events}}; | *Include a {{isdaprov|Hierachy of Events}}; | ||
*Consider the impact re a deferral of {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} etc. | *Consider the impact re a deferral of {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} etc. | ||
The concept also impacts the basis of [[Close Out]] because the {{2002ma}} requires use of true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the bid/offer where a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} (or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the {{1992ma}} with a “Two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}} | The concept also impacts the basis of [[Close Out]] because the {{2002ma}} requires use of true mids for valuation i.e, not the mean of each party's view of the bid/offer where a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}} (or {{isdaprov|Illegality}}) occurs, which is effectively what you get under the {{1992ma}} with a “Two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}}” option. | ||
{{isdaanatomy}} | {{isdaanatomy}} |