|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Force Majeure - EFET Allowance Provision|Functionally]], the definitions of {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} in the EFET and IETA versions, and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} in the {{euadefs}} are the same.
| | {{emissions force majeure overview}} |
| | |
| Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}} between IETA and EFET, and here is a {{diff||}} between EFET and ISDA.
| |
| | |
| The differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.
| |
| | |
| The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else.
| |
| | |
| Here, for good order, is a {{diff|77096|77095}} between {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} under the {{efetannex}} and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} under the {{emissionsannex}}.
| |