83,240
edits
Template:M summ EFET Allowance Annex 4.2: Difference between revisions
Template:M summ EFET Allowance Annex 4.2 (view source)
Revision as of 10:11, 14 September 2023
, 14 September 2023no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This is mostly throat clearing stuff, though there is an odd appeal to parties being bound by customary market practice to comply with a 30 calendar day notice requirement to designate a Holding Account. Which is all fine, but, look, {{efeta}} ''you are a bilateral contract''. You impose notice periods ''contractually''. If you want to stipulate a fixed number of days’ notice, just say it: there is no value in also referring to it being “customary market practice”....") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is mostly throat clearing stuff, though there is an odd appeal to parties being bound by customary market practice to comply with a 30 calendar day notice requirement to designate a Holding Account. Which is all fine, but, look, {{efeta}} ''you are a bilateral contract''. You impose notice periods ''contractually''. If you want to stipulate a fixed number of days’ notice, just say it: there is no value in also referring to it being “customary market practice”. What happens if customary market practice changes? | [[Definition of Schedule - EFET Allowance Provision|This]] is mostly throat clearing stuff, though there is an odd appeal to parties being bound by customary market practice to comply with a 30 calendar day notice requirement to designate a Holding Account. Which is all fine, but, look, {{efeta}} ''you are a bilateral contract''. You impose notice periods ''contractually''. If you want to stipulate a fixed number of days’ notice, just say it: there is no value in also referring to it being “customary market practice”. What happens if customary market practice changes? | ||
Instead of: | Instead of: | ||