83,759
edits
Template:Isda 5(b)(ii) comp: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "There is no Force Majeure in the {{1992ma}}, though parties would habitually negotiate one in, and by the time the 2002ma}} was published it was in fairly standardised. For those who didn’t negotiate it in there was also the ISDA Illegality/Force Majeure Protocol (see [http://www.isda.org/2012illegalityprot/docs/ISDA_Protocol_-_Adoption_of_2002_Illegality_FM_provisions_Final.pdf here]) which they could sign — upon payment of the suitable fee is ISDA — to adopt/...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is no Force Majeure in the {{1992ma}}, though parties would habitually negotiate one in, and by the time the 2002ma}} was published it was in fairly standardised. For those who didn’t negotiate it in there was also the [[ISDA Illegality/Force Majeure Protocol]] (see [http://www.isda.org/2012illegalityprot/docs/ISDA_Protocol_-_Adoption_of_2002_Illegality_FM_provisions_Final.pdf here]) which they could sign — upon payment of the suitable fee is ISDA — to adopt/incorporate the relevant parts. | There is no Force Majeure in the {{1992ma}}, though parties would habitually negotiate one in, and by the time the {{2002ma}} was published it was in fairly standardised. For those who didn’t negotiate it in there was also the [[ISDA Illegality/Force Majeure Protocol]] (see [http://www.isda.org/2012illegalityprot/docs/ISDA_Protocol_-_Adoption_of_2002_Illegality_FM_provisions_Final.pdf here]) which they could sign — upon payment of the suitable fee is ISDA — to adopt/incorporate the relevant parts. | ||