83,584
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
====On becoming a shibboleth==== | ====On becoming a shibboleth==== | ||
Through habit and inattention we work around the [[ | Through habit and inattention, we work ''around'' the [[easance]]s<ref>Yes, the JC made this word up. Think of it most nearly as the opposite of a nuisance.</ref> once we made to make our built environment better. What started out as a practical shortcut — the shortest possible route to market — can, through acquiescent disregard, become its own shibboleth: an ''obstacle'' on the road to transaction. | ||
So it is with the {{isdama}}. Once precisely a facilitation technique — an artifact for quickly tidying up and dispensing with formalities it would be laborious to repeat for every trade — it became a mountain of its own. Sure, you only need to climb it, from the bottom, once, but it has become a three-month climb. And one does not scale an ISDA master agreement the way Alex Honnold scales El Cap. There is the entire modernist machinery of the multi-national corporation campaign that you must take with you. | |||
There are those who miss the good old days. Where bank legal departments have not legislated outright against them — most have — the temptation now is to ask “must we really have an ISDA? Would not a [[long-form confirmation]] do? | There are those who miss the good old days. Where bank legal departments have not legislated outright against them — most have — the temptation now is to ask “must we really have an ISDA? Would not a [[long-form confirmation]] do? |