Structurer: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Structurer (view source)

Revision as of 18:29, 12 April 2022

127 bytes added , 12 April 2022

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,853

edits

Revision as of 12:43, 17 December 2020 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 18:29, 12 April 2022 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{g}}A queer fish with an odd relationship with the [[Legal Eagles\|legal department]], from whose bosom the very idea of a “structurer” originated. [[Structurers]], and ''legal'' structurers, are some kind of odd hybrid between [[Sales]] and [[Trading]], hired onto the desk in the dog days of 2005 (when anyone actually ''did'' “[[structuring]]”) to salt away the fiddly details of a complex derivative trade that [[Trading]] can’t model and [[Sales]] has no hope of understanding, let alone giving the merest toss about. Structurers are essentially [[Mediocre lawyer\|lawyers]] that have got a bit giddy about working in an [[investment bank]].		{{a\|people\|[[File:Top gun actor.png\|450px\|thumb\|center\|A top gun [[structurer]], yesterday.]]}}{{d\|Structurer\|/ˈstrʌkʧərə/\|n\|}}A queer fish with an odd relationship with the [[Legal Eagles\|legal department]], from whose bosom the very idea of a “structurer” originated. [[Structurers]], and ''legal'' structurers, are some kind of odd hybrid between [[Sales]] and [[Trading]], hired onto the desk in the dog days of 2005 (when anyone actually ''did'' “[[structuring]]”) to salt away the fiddly details of a complex derivative trade that [[Trading]] can’t model and [[Sales]] has no hope of understanding, let alone giving the merest toss about. Structurers are essentially [[Mediocre lawyer\|lawyers]] that have got a bit giddy about working in an [[investment bank]].

	Whether she is a legal übermensch who has overcome her basic nature to become something greater, or just a runt who, having proven unable to hack the rigours of unadulterated legal practice, has succumbed to her own mortal weakness, is a matter of conjecture. Opinions are divided: [[structurers]] will tell you it’s the former; unreconstructed [[Inhouse counsel\|in-house lawyers]] will swear it’s the latter — each talks her own book, in other words — though the irony is that [[private practice lawyer]]s will say exactly the same thing about those who have gone in-house.		Whether she is a legal übermensch who has overcome her basic nature to become something greater, or just a runt who, having proven unable to hack the rigours of unadulterated legal practice, has succumbed to her own mortal weakness, is a matter of conjecture. Opinions are divided: [[structurers]] will tell you it’s the former; unreconstructed [[Inhouse counsel\|in-house lawyers]] will swear it’s the latter — each talks her own book, in other words — though the irony is that [[private practice lawyer]]s will say exactly the same thing about those who have gone in-house.