Substance and form: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
There is a logic to this: the power of big data is their emergent properties: you can extract from a mass of data qualities you can’t see from individual instances. That one kettle goes on at 4:30 in the afternoon signifies nothing in particular; that fourteen million do tells you it’s half time in the football.  
There is a logic to this: the power of big data is their emergent properties: you can extract from a mass of data qualities you can’t see from individual instances. That one kettle goes on at 4:30 in the afternoon signifies nothing in particular; that fourteen million do tells you it’s half time in the football.  


This is a correlation, not a causation, and it won't flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 in the afternoon, and so did a million football watchers, that doesn't mean you were watching the football. Probability is an is, not an ought.  
This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought.  
 
 


{{Seealso}}
{{Seealso}}
*Closely related to the [[technology paradox]]
*Closely related to the [[technology paradox]]