Substance and form: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought.  
This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought.  
Hume: you cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”. The [[JC]]: you cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”.
*[[doctrine of precedent]]
*[[algorithms and heuristics]]
*[[internal audit]]


{{Seealso}}
{{Seealso}}
*Closely related to the [[technology paradox]]
*Closely related to the [[technology paradox]]