Swap It Out: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{popsong|Swap It Out|Justin Bieber|30474835}}
{{popsong|Swap It Out|Justin Bieber|30474835}}
It's an honest try but on balance it still falls into the “mangle” category: Mr. Bieber seems to have no real concept of the binding nature of [[legal obligation|legal obligations]], and is wooly about the implications of derivatives as speculative or wagering contracts, at least where there is no plausible [[representations]] as to their application for ''bona fide'' [[hedging]] purposes.  
It's an honest try but on balance it still falls into the “mangle” category: Mr. Bieber seems to have no real concept of the binding nature of [[legal obligation|legal obligations]], and at best is woolly about the implications of [[derivative]]s as speculative or wagering contracts, at least where there are no plausible [[representations]] they they are being used for ''bona fide'' [[hedging]] purposes.  


And ultimately [[swap]]ping hearts, which among young, uncynical and unscarred people such as Mr Bieber and his Beliebers, are largely [[fungible]], the transaction seems to be light on substance so there's a question of adequate [[consideration]].
And ultimately [[swap]]ping hearts, which among young, uncynical and unscarred people such as Mr Bieber and his “beliebers”, are largely [[fungible]], the transaction seems to be light on [[substance]] so there’s a question of adequate [[consideration]].


With that in mind, judge for yourself:
With that in mind, judge for yourself: