Systems theory: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (Amwelladmin moved page Systems analysis to Systems theory)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}Organisational systems can be [[Simple system|simple]], [[Complicated system|complicated]] or [[Complex systems|complex]]. Best you know which one yours is. Differentiate between the ''type of system'' and ''how to manage that system''. So:  
{{a|devil|}}
{{Quote|A stock is the foundation of any system. Stocks are the elements in the system that you can see, feel, count, or measure at any given time. A system stock is just what it sounds like: a store, a quantity, an accumulation of material or information that has built up over time. It may be the water in a bathtub, a population, the books in a bookstore, the wood in a tree, the money in the bank, your own self-confidence. A stock does not have to be physical. Your reserve of good will for others or your supply of hope that the world can be better are both stocks.
:—{{br|Thinking in Systems}} by {{author|Donatella H Meadows}}.}}
 
[[Systems theory]] eschews the reductionist, deterministic, “[[normal science|scientific]]” disposition and views the world in terms of inter-operating systems. That is to say it treats the the ordinary interactions of life as as complex and not merely complicated problems to solve.
 
Systems are comprise of stocks, flows, and feedback loops.
 
===Complexity Theory===
Organisational systems can be [[Simple system|simple]], [[Complicated system|complicated]] or [[Complex systems|complex]]. Best you know which one yours is. Differentiate between the ''type of system'' and ''how to manage that system''. So:  
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! {{header left}} System !! {{header left}} System characteristics !! {{header left}} How to manage !! {{header left}} Example
! {{header left}} System !! {{header left}} System characteristics !! {{header left}} How to manage !! {{header left}} Example