Systems theory: Difference between revisions

Systems theory (view source)

Revision as of 12:22, 12 February 2022

4 bytes removed , 12 February 2022

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,882

edits

Revision as of 13:21, 27 June 2021 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:22, 12 February 2022 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{a\|~~design~~\|}}{{quote\|''If you had a population that were miserable and restless because they had nowhere bearable to live, the preferred solution seemed not to be spending money on improving their conditions, but on hiring more police in case things turned ugly.''		{{a\|bi\|}}{{quote\|''If you had a population that were miserable and restless because they had nowhere bearable to live, the preferred solution seemed not to be spending money on improving their conditions, but on hiring more police in case things turned ugly.''

	{{author\|Alan Moore}}, {{br\|Jerusalem}}}}[[Systems theory]] eschews the reductionist, deterministic, “[[normal science\|scientific]]” disposition and views the world in terms of inter-operating systems. That is to say, it treats the ordinary interactions of life as [[complex]] and not merely [[complicated]] problems to solve; as interactions of and between systems. System interactions are necessarily complex in that they are not finite, they are [[non-linear]], and the rules of engagement nor information about the system are neither complete, coherent nor static.		{{author\|Alan Moore}}, {{br\|Jerusalem}}}}[[Systems theory]] eschews the reductionist, deterministic, “[[normal science\|scientific]]” disposition and views the world in terms of inter-operating systems. That is to say, it treats the ordinary interactions of life as [[complex]] and not merely [[complicated]] problems to solve; as interactions of and between systems. System interactions are necessarily complex in that they are not finite, they are [[non-linear]], and the rules of engagement nor information about the system are neither complete, coherent nor static.