Template:Affiliate capsule: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "The idea of an “affiliate” is really not a complicated one in the abstract but yet in the world of contracting commercial undertakings it is one which our learned frie...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The idea of an “[[affiliate]]” is really not a complicated one in the abstract but yet in the world of contracting commercial undertakings it is one which our learned friends rejoice in overdetermining.  
An “[[affiliate]]” is really not a complicated idea in the abstract but yet in the world of commercial contracts, it is one which [[Legal Eagle|our learned friends]] rejoice in overdetermining. For these men and women, a “affiliate” of an undertaking could be:
 
For corporate being, an affiliate could be:
*'''Parent''': its parent or holding company, which holds all or a majority of its ordinary share capital — often abbreviated as a “holdco”
*'''Parent''': its parent or holding company, which holds all or a majority of its ordinary share capital — often abbreviated as a “holdco”
*'''Child''': its subsidiary — a company the ordinary share capital of which it holds all or a majority
*'''Child''': its subsidiary — a company the ordinary share capital of which it holds all or a majority
*'''Sibling''': a company in common ownership with the corporate being; that is to say, a company that shares the same parent or holding company.
*'''Sibling''': a company in common ownership with the corporate being; that is to say, a company that shares the same parent or holding company.
Pedants will be anxious to point out that, ordinary shares being the divisible ownership units that they are, and different degrees of control and voting rights attaching to different classes of share, there are ''degrees'' of ownership, and affiliation, and some ought to imply more connectedness than others. For example, if one owns a small parcel of shares in a listed company does that make it your affiliate? One would like to think not.


No doubt pedants will be anxious to point out that, ordinary shares being the divisible ownership units that they are, and different degrees of control and voting rights attaching to different classes of share, there are ''degrees'' of ownership, and some ought to imply more connectedness than others. Fur example, if one owns a small parcel of shares in a listed company does that make it your affiliate? One would like to think not.
Any confusion is usually resolved by pointing at the definition of “subsidiary” and “holding company” in the [[Companies Act 2006 (UK)|Companies Act]]. The {{isdama}} does a reasonably neat job of capturing the above by reference to the majority of voting control.
 
In any event the confusion is usually resolved by pointing at the definition of “subsidiary” and “holding company” contained in the [[Companies Act 2006 (UK)|Companies Act]]. The {{isdama}} does a reasonably neat job of capturing the above by reference to the majority of voting control.