Template:Apocalypse maxim: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Template:Apocalypse maxim (view source)

Revision as of 16:39, 20 August 2021

768 bytes added , 20 August 2021

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,892

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Let us coin a [[maxim]]:
-{{quote|“[[before an apocalypse becomes an apocalypse, it doesn’t look like an apocalypse|before an apocalypse ''becomes'' an apocalypse, it doesn’t ''look'' like an apocalypse]]”.}}
+{{quote|“{{maxim|Before an apocalypse becomes an apocalypse, it doesn’t look like an apocalypse}}.”}}
-The studied, logical outrage vouchsafed by those in the riskless position of having twenty-twenty hindsight and blaming the [[meatware]] ''was not available to those on deck at the time''. No-one ''knew'' or — at least until it was too late, even ''believed'' — Archegos would become Archegos. The decision calculus was nowhere near as obvious as it appears in the rear-view mirror: if it had been, ''the catastrophe would not have happened''. Archegos’ positions may have rallied.
+Risk-free, twenty-twenty hindsight is by definition not available to those who must make the decisions that lead to it. Only later does the reactor core melt down. Only later does the market crash. Beforehand, no-one ''knew'' or — at least until it was too late, even ''believed'' — that things would turn out like this. [[Q.E.D.]]
-Furthermore, it is one thing to have a legal right to pull your trigger, it is quite another to resolve to use it. ''Especially'' if you don’t know how this all will play out.
+Why did people do what they did when it was so obviously stupid looking back at it? Well, As {{author|Sidney Dekker}} puts it in his excellent {{br|The Field Guide to Human Error Investigations}}:
-''After'' the event, things are ''obvious''. There was only ever one option.
+{{quote|“Forks in the road stand out so clearly to you, looking back. But when inside the tunnel, when looking forward and being pushed ahead by unfolding events, these forks were shrouded in the uncertainty and complexity of many possible options and demands; they were surrounded by time constraints and other pressures.”}}
-''Before'' it, there were twenty million dollars of annual revenues at stake: the decision to blow up a key client is not one many individuals will be prepared to make on their own. Institutional [[Escalation circle|escalations]] are time consuming, fraught, intimidating things. To recommend affronting a [[platinum client]] is to invite a shellacking from someone a long way further up the tree than you are. If these are your options, is it any wonder a risk manager will dodge the hard questions?
+Ergo, the decision calculus then was nowhere near as obvious as it appears now, as an object in the rear-view mirror: if it had been, t''he catastrophe would not have happened''.
+And it is one thing to have a right to pull your trigger, it is quite another to be prepared to use it. Especially if you don’t know how this all will play out.
+''After'' the event, all that remains is is a smoking hulk and twisted wreckage strewn across the landscape and it could not be more obvious that there was only ever one option.
+''Before'' it, there were twenty million dollars of annual revenues at stake.
+Few individuals will blow up a significant business relationship without diffusing responsibility through some kind of institutional [[escalation]]. But that takes time. And escalations are fraught: to recommend affronting a [[platinum client]] is to invite a shellacking from someone [[Christian name|a long way further up the tree than you]].
+Now: if these are the options, and our valiant risk manager doesn’t yet have that twenty-twenty hindsight of what might come about tomorrow, is it any wonder she’ll be tempted to do nothing?
+{{maxim|Before an apocalypse becomes an apocalypse, it doesn’t look like an apocalypse}}.