82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Few things are apt to cause more confusion, fear and loathing for less good reason the legal status, as regards ''itself'', of a company’s various [[branch]]es. | |||
Few things are apt to cause more confusion, fear and loathing for less good reason the legal status, as regards itself, of a company’s various [[branch]]es | |||
It is apt to thoroughly confuse [[muggle]]s which, on a busy day, can be the last thing a [[legal eagle]] needs, but on a slow one is fertile grounds for a little sport at the expense of our [[Muggle|non-magical friends]]. You will be surprised how often one is asked to review, approve or even sign a [[contract]], [[keep-well agreement]] or [[service level agreement]] between a branch of a company and its head office. | |||
*'''[[Affiliate]]s''': By contrast, a company’s [[affiliate]] is a related but separate [[legal entity]]. If a company is a person, its affiliate is its parent, child, or sibling. Parent affiliates are actually even called [[parent]]s. Children are [[wholly-owned subsidiaries]], ugly stepchildren and bastards are [[majority-owned subsidiaries]] and siblings are known as companies “under common ownership”. There is plenty of scope for ugly sisters, black sheep and long-lost cousins from Australia, as you can imagine. Proper [[Affiliate|affiliates]] may be consolidated from a financial reporting perspective, but generally (and unless it has specifically agreed to) an affiliate is not responsible for performing the obligations of its any of its [[affiliate]]s unless it agrees to do so by [[contract]] (such as a [[guarantee]]). | The most pragmatic response is just to sign it, wearily, but purists will find this at least aggravating and many will regard it as nothing less than a betrayal of the attorney’s sacred oath. It should not take a first in jurisprudence from Cambridge to comprehend that a fellow cannot enter a legal contract with herself.<ref>Or a lease: {{casenote|Rye|Rye}}.</ref> | ||
*'''[[Branch|Branches]]''': If a [[company]] is a [[Corporate personality|person]] — and legally, it is — think of a [[branch]] like its arm or leg. A “[[branch]]” is a single office or presence of the larger [[legal entity]]. It does not have its own [[legal personality]], [[creditworthiness]] or independent standing in the commercial world. Like an arm or a leg, it is part of a greater whole. It may just be a single premises of the company — the “Muswell Hill branch of Sainsbury’s”, for example — but in the world of [[high finance]] it is usually the whole presence of that [[legal entity]] in a given city or country. | |||
*'''[[Affiliate]]s''': By contrast, a company’s [[affiliate]] is a related but separate [[legal entity]]. If a company is a person, its affiliate is its parent, child, or sibling. Parent affiliates are actually even called [[parent]]s. Children are [[wholly-owned subsidiaries]], ugly stepchildren and bastards are [[majority-owned subsidiaries]] and siblings are known as companies “under common ownership”. There is plenty of scope for ugly sisters, black sheep and long-lost cousins from Australia, as you can imagine. Proper [[Affiliate|affiliates]] may be consolidated from a financial reporting perspective, but generally (and unless it has specifically agreed to) an affiliate is not responsible for performing the obligations of its any of its [[affiliate]]s unless it agrees to do so by [[contract]] (such as a [[guarantee]]). <br> |