82,891
edits
Template:Calculation agent dispute: Difference between revisions
Template:Calculation agent dispute (view source)
Revision as of 11:53, 13 April 2017
, 13 April 2017no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===Should you include a dispute right for determinations made by the calculation agent?=== Recognising that “should you?”, and “will you have to”, are different questi...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*The [[Dealer]] will be the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}}. (''True''.) | *The [[Dealer]] will be the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}}. (''True''.) | ||
*The [[Dealer]] will be the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}. (''True''.) | *The [[Dealer]] will be the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}}. (''True''.) | ||
*[[Dealer]]s are bad, venal people. They have blackened hearts and will stop at nothing to rip their clients’ faces off. We need some check on their unfettered and sure-to-be outrageously exercised discretion. (''A matter of debate, but if that’s your starting point | *[[Dealer]]s are bad, venal people. They have blackened hearts and will stop at nothing to rip their clients’ faces off. We need some check on their unfettered and sure-to-be outrageously exercised discretion. (''A matter of debate, but if that’s your starting point a far better question for you is why are you doing business with this [[Non mentula esse|vassal]] in the first place?'') | ||