Template:Commodity regulation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "You must have a taste for multi-dimensional chess if you want to understand what is required in the world of commodities, freight, weather derivatives and emission allow...")
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
You must have a taste for multi-dimensional chess if you want to understand what is required in the world of [[commodities]], freight, weather derivatives and [[emission allowances]]. To wit:
You must have a taste for multi-dimensional chess if you want to understand what is required in the world of [[commodities]], freight, weather derivatives and [[emission allowances]]. To wit:


*'''Actual [[emission allowances]]''', resembling as they do abstract financial instruments, are ''in'' scope.
Section C of Annex I to [[MiFID]] includes the following emissions and commodity products as within the scope for [[Financial instrument|financial instruments]]:
*'''Actual [[commodities]]''', being consumable, perishable, paint ’em yellow pass ’em off as copper, real-world things that people actually need to live, are ''out'' of scope.
{{quote|{{MIFID commodity financial instruments}} }}
 
 
===In scope===
*'''Actual [[emission allowances]]''', resembling as they do abstract [[Financial instrument|financial instruments]] — and actually listed as such in Section C of Annex III of MiFID 2 (see point 11! they just snuck in there!) are ''in'' scope.  
*'''[[Emission allowances derivatives]]''', whether physically- or cash-settled, are ''in'' scope.
*'''[[Emission allowances derivatives]]''', whether physically- or cash-settled, are ''in'' scope.
*'''[[Cash-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]''' — including ones where either party has an option to cash-settle — are in scope.
*'''[[Cash-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]''' — including ones where either party has an option to cash-settle — are in scope.
*'''[[Physically-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]''' are ''out'' of scope ... ''unless'' they are traded on an EU [[trading venue]], (i.e, [[OTC]] [[physically-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]) in which case they are in scope ... unless they are “wholesale energy products traded on an OTF that must be physically settled” - which case they are ''out'' of scope.
*'''[[Weather derivatives]], freight, inflation and economic indicator derivatives''' that can be [[cash-settled]] (it would be kind of fun having [[physically-settled]] weather derivatives wouldn’t it) are ''in'' scope.
*[[Physically-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]] which would otherwise be out of scope, if not used “for commercial purposes” and having “the characteristics of [[derivative]] [[financial instruments]]” are ''in'' scope.
 
*'''[[Weather derivatives]], freight, inflation and economic indicator derivatives''' that can be cash-settled (it would be kind of fun having physically settled weather derivatives wouldn’t it) are ''in'' scope.
==={{strike|Out of...|''In''}} scope===
*'''[[Physically-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]''' which (per below) would otherwise be out of scope, if not used “for commercial purposes” and having “the characteristics of [[derivative]] [[financial instruments]]” are ''in'' scope. That one had you going didn’t it!
 
===''Really'' out of scope===
*'''Actual [[commodities]]''', being consumable, perishable, paint ’em yellow ’n’ pass ’em off as copper, real-world things that people actually need to live, are ''out'' of scope.
*'''[[Physically-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]''' (not falling into the no-man’s land bucket above) are ''out'' of scope ...
:... ''unless'' they are traded on an EU [[trading venue]], (i.e, [[OTC]] [[physically-settled]] [[commodity derivatives]]) in which case they are ''in'' scope ...
:: ... unless they are “wholesale energy products traded on an OTF that must be physically settled”  — which case they are ''out'' of scope again. I DON’T MAKE THE RULES FOLKS.