Template:Copyright and confidence: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
===On the distinction between [[copyright]] and [[confidence]]===
===On the distinction between [[copyright]] and [[confidence]]===
The key thing is to distinguish between [[breach of copyright]] and [[breach of confidence]].  The former is an '''[[intellectual property]] right''' over the [[form]] of information; the latter a '''[[contract]]ual right''' over the [[substance]] of information.
The key thing is to distinguish between [[breach of copyright]] and [[breach of confidence]].  The former is an '''[[intellectual property]] right''' over the [[form]] of information; the latter a '''[[contract]]ual right''' over the [[substance]] of information.
*'''[[Breach of copyright]]''': Copyright subsists in the particular articulation of the information, rather than in the information per se. To breach of copyright is to deny a copyright owner the commercial benefit of its creation: e.g., by accessing for free something the copyright owner wants you to pay for. In other words I ''can’t'' copy ''Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone'' without J.K. Rowling’s permission, but I ''can'' tell you the plot.  
*'''[[Breach of copyright]]''': [[Copyright]] subsists in the particular articulation of the information, rather than in the information per se. To [[breach]] someone’s [[copyright]] is to deny a copyright owner the commercial benefit of its creation: e.g., by accessing for free something the copyright owner wants you to pay for. In other words I ''can’t'' copy ''Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone'' without J.K. Rowling’s permission, but I ''can'' tell you the plot.  
*'''[[Breach of confidence]]''': [[Breach of confidence]] is less about the ''[[form]]'' of the information and more about its ''[[substance]]'': If I have signed a [[confidentiality agreement]] I can ''copy'' {{confiprov|confidential information}} to my heart’s content, as long as I only use it within the bounds of my [[licence]] to {{confiprov|use}} it. In other words, I can do what I like as long as I don’t disclose the ''content'' of that information to anyone else. Here the forbidden action is “telling you the plot”: I could do that either by giving you a full copy of the material, ''or'' telling you the plot without copying anything at all. [[Breach of confidence]] thus creates heightened compliance issues, implying as it does that the {{confiprov|confidential information}} is not public, presenting risks of market abuse and insider dealing.
*'''[[Breach of confidence]]''': [[Breach of confidence]] is less about the ''[[form]]'' of the information and more about its ''[[substance]]'': If I have signed a [[confidentiality agreement]] I can ''copy'' {{confiprov|confidential information}} to my heart’s content, as long as I only use it within the bounds of my [[licence]] to {{confiprov|use}} it. In other words, I can do what I like as long as I don’t disclose the ''content'' of that information to anyone else. Here the forbidden action is “telling you the plot”: I could do that either by giving you a full copy of the material, ''or'' telling you the plot without copying anything at all. [[Breach of confidence]] thus creates heightened compliance issues, implying as it does that the {{confiprov|confidential information}} is not public, presenting risks of market abuse and insider dealing.
*It is the substantive content and not the particular form of the information that is valuable.
*It is the substantive content and not the particular form of the information that is valuable.