83,024
edits
Template:Counterparts capsule: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Away from the gripping world of land law, a “[[counterparts]]” clause is as useful as a chocolate tea-pot. Indeed: even ''there'', it is a waste of trees, because if the law decrees everyone has to sign the same physical bit of paper, a clause ''on'' that bit of paper | Away from the gripping world of land law, a “[[counterparts]]” clause is as useful as a chocolate tea-pot. Indeed: even ''there'', it is a waste of trees, because if the law decrees everyone has to sign the same physical bit of paper, a clause ''on'' that bit of paper saying that they ''don’t'' won’t change a blasted thing. There is a [[Chicken-licken|chicken]]-and-[[egg]] problem here; a temporal {{t|paradox}}. But do not let that stop your [[legal eagle]]s insisting on a [[counterparts]] clause, on pain of cratering the trade — realistically, you couldn’t stop them if you tried — for a fellow has to put food on the table for his younglings. | ||
''Black’s Law Dictionary'' has the following to say on [[counterparts]]: | ''Black’s Law Dictionary'' has the following to say on [[counterparts]]: | ||