82,853
edits
Template:Credit support annex as a credit support document: Difference between revisions
Template:Credit support annex as a credit support document (view source)
Revision as of 11:01, 25 February 2020
, 25 February 2020→... But the {{nycsa}} is a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===The {{csa}} is ''not'' a Credit Support Document...=== Note that a {{tag|CSA}}<ref>and its VM update, the {{vmcsa}}.</ref> is '''not''' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Note that a {{tag|CSA}}<ref>and its VM update, the {{vmcsa}}.</ref> is '''not''' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, and you should not list it as one in {{isdaprov|Part 4}} of the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, however satisfying it might be to do so. I mean it sounds like one, right? But no: the counterparty cannot be its own {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}. The {{csa}} is, rather, a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}. This is rather important to the whole issue of [[close-out netting]]. Deep [[ISDA lore]]. | Note that a {{tag|CSA}}<ref>and its VM update, the {{vmcsa}}.</ref> is '''not''' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, and you should not list it as one in {{isdaprov|Part 4}} of the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, however satisfying it might be to do so. I mean it sounds like one, right? But no: the counterparty cannot be its own {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}. The {{csa}} is, rather, a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}. This is rather important to the whole issue of [[close-out netting]]. Deep [[ISDA lore]]. | ||
===... | ===... but the {{nycsa}} ''is'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}=== | ||
Because it is a {{sfca}} arrangement and not a {{ttca}}, transfer of credit support under a {{nycsa}}<ref>and its VM update, the {{nyvmcsa}}.</ref> does not change the net liabilities between the parties, the {{nycsa}} (and its regulatory VM successor, the {{nyvmcsa}} is a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} and not a transaction under the {{isdama}}. Fun, huh? | Because it is a {{sfca}} arrangement and not a {{ttca}}, transfer of credit support under a {{nycsa}}<ref>and its VM update, the {{nyvmcsa}}.</ref> does not change the net liabilities between the parties, the {{nycsa}} (and its regulatory VM successor, the {{nyvmcsa}} is a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} and not a transaction under the {{isdama}}. Fun, huh? | ||