82,891
edits
Template:Critical theory, modernism and the death of objective truth: Difference between revisions
Template:Critical theory, modernism and the death of objective truth (view source)
Revision as of 18:25, 4 May 2021
, 4 May 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Most conspiracy theories contain a grain of [[truth]]. Some are completely true. There has to be ''something'' for the credulous people to glom onto. As it matures, [[critical theory]] begins to resemble a [[conspiracy theory]]. | Most conspiracy theories contain a grain of [[truth]]. Some are completely true. There has to be ''something'' for the credulous people to glom onto. As it matures, [[critical theory]] begins to resemble a [[conspiracy theory]]. | ||
[[Critical theory]]’s grain of truth, ironically, is that ''there is no truth''. This is its debt to [[post-modernism]], and it is a proposition that contemporary rationalists find hard to accept, whether hailing from the right — see {{author|Douglas Murray}}’s {{br|The Madness of Crowds}} for an articulate example — or the left {{author|Helen Pluckrose}}’s detailed examination in {{br|Cynical Theories}}. | [[Critical theory]]’s grain of truth, ironically, is that ''there is no truth''. Well, not quite that: it is a self-refuting statement: but that the idea of a transcendent, objective “truth” is incoherent. There is no objective truth, ''because the idea of “objective truth” doesn’t make sense''. “Truth” is property of language. “Objects” are not. Objects ''aren’t'' true or false: ''only propositions about them are''. Propositions are linguistic artifacts. Outside the language they are uttered in, they are only marks on a page. | ||
This is its debt to [[post-modernism]], and it is a proposition that contemporary rationalists find hard to accept, whether hailing from the right — see {{author|Douglas Murray}}’s {{br|The Madness of Crowds}} for an articulate example — or the left {{author|Helen Pluckrose}}’s detailed examination in {{br|Cynical Theories}}. | |||
The problem, all seem to agree, is this modern rejection of ''[[truth]]''. And it isn’t by any means limited to the critical theorists: it lives in Kellyanne Conway’s “alternative facts”, in Elon Musk’s [[twitter]] feed, and the generally relaxed attitude to rigorous fact-checking of the populist right. | The problem, all seem to agree, is this modern rejection of ''[[truth]]''. And it isn’t by any means limited to the critical theorists: it lives in Kellyanne Conway’s “alternative facts”, in Elon Musk’s [[twitter]] feed, and the generally relaxed attitude to rigorous fact-checking of the populist right. | ||