82,891
edits
Template:Critical theory, modernism and the death of objective truth: Difference between revisions
Template:Critical theory, modernism and the death of objective truth (view source)
Revision as of 12:16, 6 May 2021
, 6 May 2021no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Most conspiracy theories contain a grain of [[truth]]. Some are completely true. There has to be ''something'' for the credulous people to glom onto. As it matures, [[critical theory]] begins to resemble a [[conspiracy theory]]. | Most conspiracy theories contain a grain of [[truth]]. Some are completely true. There has to be ''something'' for the credulous people to glom onto. As it matures, [[critical theory]] begins to resemble a [[conspiracy theory]]. | ||
[[Critical theory]]’s grain of truth, ironically, is that ''there is no truth''. Well, not quite | [[Critical theory]]’s grain of truth, ironically, is that ''there is no truth''. | ||
Well, not ''quite'' — “it is true that there is no truth” refutes itself, after all — but rather that the idea of “[[objective truth]]” is ''incoherent''. There is no [[objective truth]], ''because the idea of “objective truth” doesn’t make sense''. Truths are ''propositions'' about ''things''. Propositions put things into a relationship with each other: “the cat sat on the mat”. “Propositions” are a property of language: they only exist within the framework of a language. “Things” are not — things (we preesume — have continutiy whether we see them or not, and whether we talk about them or not. Things are properties of the universe. | |||
Thus, things ''aren’t'' true or false: ''only propositions about things are''. Propositions are prisoners of the language they are articulated in. beyond it, they are only marks on a page. | |||
“گربه روی کلاه نشست” | |||
See? | |||
Truths are propositions. Truths, therefore are prisoners of the language they are articulated in. Truth cannot “transcend” language. | |||
This is its debt to [[post-modernism]], and it is a proposition that contemporary rationalists find hard to accept, whether hailing from the right — see {{author|Douglas Murray}}’s {{br|The Madness of Crowds}} for an articulate example — or the left — see {{author|Helen Pluckrose}}’s patient and detailed examination in {{br|Cynical Theories}}. | This is its debt to [[post-modernism]], and it is a proposition that contemporary rationalists find hard to accept, whether hailing from the right — see {{author|Douglas Murray}}’s {{br|The Madness of Crowds}} for an articulate example — or the left — see {{author|Helen Pluckrose}}’s patient and detailed examination in {{br|Cynical Theories}}. | ||