Template:Crmtechniques: Difference between revisions

Note the difference between [[CRM technique|techniques]] which mitigate a credit risk that you nonetheless have — as above — and those which negate the [[credit exposure]] in the first place. So, ''par example'', a [[title-transfer collateral arrangement]] whereby a bank transfers outright {{tag|collateral}} to a counterparty may, as part of  a valid netting agreement, mitigate that collateral but will leave you with an exposure to any [[excess collateral]] or [[haircut]]; however transfer under a [[pledged collateral arrangement]] — at least [[to the exent]] that you don't surrender legal title to the collateral at all — will leave you with no counterparty {{tag|credit exposure}} at all to the haircut or excess, seeing as it is yours, and if the counterparty goes [[bust]], you will be entitled to have it returned in full.