83,056
edits
Template:Csa Dispute Resolution comp: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''1995 CSA v 2016 VM CSA (English law)''': But for a subsection dealing with what should happen if you are on the 1992csa and not the 2002csa (which in 1995, had not been invented), they are functionally the same.") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''1995 CSA v 2016 VM CSA (English law)''': But for a subsection dealing with what should happen if you are on the | '''1994 CSA (NY) v 1995 CSA (English)''': Largely equivalent, as this {{diff|85099|85096}} should tell you. Things that are different are: | ||
''In the 1994 NY version'': the paragraph formatting is an absolute shower, and for reasons known best to itself, {{icds}} felt compelled to add “(or Swap Transaction)” after the word “Transaction” wherever it appears. | |||
''In the 1995 UK version'': “Transfer” is not a defined term and there is a “No Event of Default” subclause (seeing as the {{1995csa}} is a Transaction under the ISDA, whereas the {{1994csa}} is not. | |||
'''1995 CSA v 2016 VM CSA (English law)''': But for a subsection dealing with what should happen if you are on the {{1992isda}} and not the {{2002isda}} (which in 1995, had not been invented), they are functionally the same. Here is a {{diff|85096|37030}}. | |||
'''1994 CSA v 2016 NY VM CSA (NY law)''': But for a similar subsection dealing with what should happen if you are on the {{1992isda}} and not the {{2002isda}} (which in 1995, had not been invented), the [[Original Gangsta CSA|OG CSA]] and VM CSA under NY law are functionally the same. Here is a {{diff|85108|85099}}. | |||
'''2016 VM CSA v 2018 IM CSD (English law)''': Similar again, without the agonising over the edition of the {{isdama}} you are using — possibly because it is not a Transaction under either of them?), but yet disowning the possibility of an Event of Default for non-payment in the event of a collateral dispute. So that is a bit flummoxing. But I bet there is a reason. | |||
{{diff|85123|37030}} | |||