82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Paragraphs {{{{{1}}}|5(a)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(i)}} is identical in the {{csa}} and the {{vmcsa}}. It is only in Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(ii)}} that things start getting a bit funky, as this {{diff|85267|85266}} illustrates. | Paragraphs {{{{{1}}}|5(a)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}} and {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(i)}} is identical in the {{csa}} and the {{vmcsa}}. It is only in Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(ii)}} that things start getting a bit funky, as this {{diff|85267|85266}} illustrates. | ||
5(c)(ii) | Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|5(c)(ii)}} and beyond in the {{vmcsa}} is an utter horror show and is broadly the same as the equivalent provision in the New York law VM CSA. There is a {{diff||}} of that to look at too. | ||
Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(i)}} is self-contained. It does not need adjustment in Paragraph {{csaprov|11}}: the reference to “Distributions” in the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|11(f)}} simply reflects the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)}}, and does not imply you need to add anything. | Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)(i)}} is self-contained. It does not need adjustment in Paragraph {{csaprov|11}}: the reference to “Distributions” in the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|11(f)}} simply reflects the heading of Paragraph {{csaprov|5(c)}}, and does not imply you need to add anything. |