Template:Csa credit support amount calculation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


This leaves you with a formula for a {{csaprov|Transferee}}’s {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} as follows: '''''Max[0, (E<sub>Tee</sub> + IA<sub>Tor</sub> - IA<sub>Tee</sub> + Threshold)].'''''
This leaves you with a formula for a {{csaprov|Transferee}}’s {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} as follows: '''''Max[0, (E<sub>Tee</sub> + IA<sub>Tor</sub> - IA<sub>Tee</sub> + Threshold)].'''''
====Example====
 
Let’s plug in some numbers. Say:
Let’s plug in some numbers. Say:
*The {{csaprov|Transferee}}’s {{csaprov|Exposure}} is 10,000,000
*The {{csaprov|Transferee}}’s {{csaprov|Exposure}} is 10,000,000
Line 19: Line 19:
Your {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} is therefore ''10,000,000 + 2,000,000 - (0 + 5,000,000) = '''7,000,000'''''.  
Your {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} is therefore ''10,000,000 + 2,000,000 - (0 + 5,000,000) = '''7,000,000'''''.  


Now, whether you have to ''pay'' anything or ''receive'' anything as a result — whether there is a {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or a {{csaprov|Return Amount}}, in other words — that depends whether the {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} is greater or smaller than your prevailing {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}}, by at least the {{csaprov|Minimum Transfer Amount}}.  
Now, whether you have to ''pay'' anything or ''receive'' anything as a result — whether there is a {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or a {{csaprov|Return Amount}}, in other words — depends whether your {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} is greater or smaller than your prevailing {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}}, by at least the {{csaprov|Minimum Transfer Amount}}.  
===={{vmcsa}} with no [[IA]] amendment====
===={{vmcsa}} with no [[IA]] amendment====
Since the {{vmcsa}} assumes there is no Independent Amounts and no Thresholds, it is quite a lot easier. It is just the Exposure. So much so, that there isn't even a concept of the Credit Support Amount under the {{vmcsa}}, unless you have retrofitted one, and who in their right mind would do that?
Since the {{vmcsa}} assumes there is no Independent Amounts and no Thresholds, it is quite a lot easier. It is just the Exposure. So much so, that there isn't even a concept of the Credit Support Amount under the {{vmcsa}}, unless you have retrofitted one, and who in their right mind would do that?
Line 25: Line 25:
Oh.
Oh.


You have, haven’t you. You’ve gone and co-opted the {{vmcsaprov|Credit Support Amount (VM/IA)}} concept in your Paragraph 11 annex, haven’t you.  
You have, haven’t you. You’ve gone and co-opted the {{vmcsaprov|Credit Support Amount (VM/IA)}} concept in your Paragraph 11 annex. Yes you did. No, don’t blame your credit department; don’t say you were just following orders. ''You did it''.


===={{vmcsa}} with a customised [[IA]] amendment====
===={{vmcsa}} with a customised [[IA]] amendment====
Never mind. Well, just for you, the formula is a sort of half-way house: Under this unholy bastardisation of a {{vmcsa}}, a {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}}’s {{vmcsaprov|Credit Support Amount}} will be: '''''Max[0, (E<sub>Tee</sub> + IA<sub>Tor</sub> - (IA<sub>Tee</sub>)].)''''' <br>
Never mind. Well, just for you, the formula is a sort of half-way house: Under this unholy bastardisation of a {{vmcsa}}, a {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}}’s {{vmcsaprov|Credit Support Amount}} will be: '''''Max[0, (E<sub>Tee</sub> + IA<sub>Tor</sub> - (IA<sub>Tee</sub>)].)''''' <br>