Template:Derived information: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==={{confiprov|Derived information}}===
==={{confiprov|Derived information}}===
{{confiprov|Derived information}}, the fecund fruits of the {{confiprov|receiver}}’s own creative juice and analytical energy, is in no sense [[proprietary]] to the {{confiprov|disclosing party}}<ref>If the {{confiprov|disclosed information}} ever was [[proprietary]] in the first place — if it doesn’t qualify as [[intellectual property]] it isn’t, or course.</ref>, and may indeed be as commercially sensitive to the {{confiprov|receiving party}} as the material the disclosing party gave, and on which it was based, it in the first place. Think Paul’s middle eight about having a shave and catching the bus in ''A Day in the Life''. We are in danger of getting into the [[jurisprudence|jurisprudential]] wisdom of treating intellectual endeavour as if it were tangible property - but let’s not go there just not<ref>Those who can’t resist the siren call, start with [[Lawrence Lessig]]’s fabulous {{br|Code: Version 2.0}}.</ref>
{{confiprov|Derived information}}, the fecund fruits of the {{confiprov|receiver}}’s own creative juice and analytical energy, is in no sense [[proprietary]] to the {{confiprov|disclosing party}}<ref>If the {{confiprov|disclosed information}} ever was [[proprietary]] in the first place, that is — if it doesn’t qualify as [[intellectual property]] it isn’t, or course.</ref>, and may indeed be as commercially sensitive to the {{confiprov|receiving party}} as the material the disclosing party gave, and on which it was based, it in the first place. Think Paul’s middle eight about having a shave and catching the bus in ''A Day in the Life''. We are in danger of getting into the [[jurisprudence|jurisprudential]] wisdom of treating intellectual endeavour as if it were tangible property - but let’s not go there just not<ref>Those who can’t resist the siren call, start with [[Lawrence Lessig]]’s fabulous {{br|Code: Version 2.0}}.</ref>