Template:Eqdef partial cancellation comp: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Paragraphs {{eqderivprov|12.2(f)}} (Tender Offers) and {{eqderivprov|12.3(e)}} Mergers) are identical in all respects other than the word “Merger” or “Tender Offer”....")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Paragraphs {{eqderivprov|12.2(f)}} (Tender Offers) and {{eqderivprov|12.3(e)}} Mergers) are identical in all respects other than the word “Merger” or “Tender Offer”.  There: that saved you a bit of bafflement.
Paragraphs {{eqderivprov|12.2(f)}} (Merger Events) and {{eqderivprov|12.3(e)}} Tender Offers) are identical in all respects other than the word “Merger” or “Tender Offer”.  There: that saved you a bit of bafflement.


That being the case you might wonder why {{icds}} saw fit to write them out separately, eschewing the option for a cheeky as the case may be — but their chosen architecture, treating {{eqderivprov|Merger Event}}s and {{eqderivprov|Tender Offer}}s separately, forces them into this leaden exposition. We have some tedious thoughts on the unwisdom of this in our [[Semantic structure - drafting principles|drafting principles]] section, if you are interested.
That being the case you might wonder why {{icds}} saw fit to write them out separately, eschewing the option for a cheeky as the case may be — but their chosen architecture, treating {{eqderivprov|Merger Event}}s and {{eqderivprov|Tender Offer}}s separately, forces them into this leaden exposition. We have some tedious thoughts on the unwisdom of this in our [[Semantic structure - drafting principles|drafting principles]] section, if you are interested.