82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:''3. Despite rigorous and comprehensive [[due diligence]], it could not have prevented the loss.'' | :''3. Despite rigorous and comprehensive [[due diligence]], it could not have prevented the loss.'' | ||
The “[[omission]] of a | The “[[omission]] of a sub-custodian to meet its obligations” — albeit through its [[insolvency]] (and associated failures in internal segregation etc) is thus not an “external event beyond the reasonable control” of the [[depositary]]. Treat this exemption as being limited to genuine [[force majeure]] events — [[acts of God]], war, insurrection, malign operation of the trade winds, etc. The [[depositary]] remains liable for the insolvency of [[sub-custodian]]s. Even un[[affiliate]]d ones. <br> |