Template:Gmsla 10.4 summ: Difference between revisions

But what of the cagey [[caveat]] about Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|9}} (''{{{{{1}}}|Failure to Deliver}}'') and Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|11}} (''{{{{{1}}}|Consequences of an Event of Default}}'')? Search me. There is no obvious exception to the ban on [[consequential loss]] in paragraph {{{{{1}}}|9}}, which talks about {{{{{1}}}|Buy-In}}s and other self-help remedies which militate pretty hard ''against'' consequential damages. Likewise, Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|11}} goes to some lengths to articulate and itemise the termination amount calculations, all of which are focused on actually incurred expenses, and there is nothing in there that talks about loss of opportunities — see Paragraph {{{{{1}}}|11.3}} in particular. If you see anything looking like consequential loss in here you have better eyesight than the [[JC]].