82,891
edits
Template:Heterogeneity as a bad thing: Difference between revisions
Template:Heterogeneity as a bad thing (view source)
Revision as of 10:03, 4 January 2023
, 4 January 2023no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Thought leader]]s — the same ones who, with the [[hive mind]], fetishise diversity — may declare that ''[[heterogeneity]]'' — contrarianism to you, dear reader — is a ''bad'' thing.<ref>But here is an irony for you: the Oxford dictionary defines | [[Thought leader]]s — the same ones who, with the [[hive mind]], fetishise diversity — may declare that ''[[heterogeneity]]'' — contrarianism to you, dear reader — is a ''bad'' thing.<ref>But here is an irony for you: the Oxford dictionary defines heterogeneity as: “the quality or state of being [[diverse]] in character or content”.</ref> | ||
“''Homo''geneity is important to bind your people to a common purpose and vision,” they will say. “''Hetero''geneity can weaken and undermine that sacred, fragile flame.” | “''Homo''geneity is important to bind your people to a common purpose and vision,” they will say. “''Hetero''geneity can weaken and undermine that sacred, fragile flame.” | ||