Template:In writing capsule: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
===Authority on legal effect of emojis===
===Authority on legal effect of emojis===


The King’s Bench of Saskatchewan — not an English court to be sure, but of persuasive value, especially when speaking this much sense — has recently affirmed the [[JC]]’s conviction about emojis by the way. In an argument about whether a merchant was bound to supply a consignment of flax on the back of an exchange of SMS messages.
The King’s Bench of Saskatchewan — not an English court to be sure, but of persuasive value, especially when speaking this much sense — has recently affirmed the [[JC]]’s conviction about emojis. In an argument about whether a merchant was bound to supply a consignment of flax on the back of an exchange of SMS messages.


The plaintiff drew up a contract to purchase SWT 86 metric tonnes of flax from the defendant, wet-signed it, took a photo of the contract and texted the photo to the defendant with the text message: “Please confirm flax contract”.  
The plaintiff drew up a contract to purchase SWT 86 metric tonnes of flax from the defendant, wet-signed it, took a photo of the contract and texted the photo to the defendant with the text message: “Please confirm flax contract”.