Template:Indemnity description: Difference between revisions

Line 14: Line 14:


=====It is not (necessarily) of indeterminate scope=====
=====It is not (necessarily) of indeterminate scope=====
Nor is a (well-crafted) {{tag|indemnity}} broader or of less determinate scope than any other contractual claim. A good one should have a predictable and reasonable financial consequence: It might be to reimburse taxes or similar unavoidable expenses a merchant incurs in performing the contract, that it would not, but for that contract. The sky should not fall in under the weight of a well-proportioned {{tag|indemnity}}. It is a precision tool to allocate responsibility for a narrow risk, not a weapon of mass destruction.
Nor is a (well-crafted) {{tag|indemnity}} broader or of less determinate scope than any other contractual claim. A good one should have a predictable and reasonable financial consequence: It might be to reimburse taxes or similar unavoidable expenses a merchant incurs in performing the contract, that it would not, but for that contract. The [[Chicken Licken|sky should not fall in]] under the weight of a well-proportioned {{tag|indemnity}}.  
 
It is a precision tool to allocate responsibility for a narrow risk, not a weapon of mass destruction.


===You keep saying “''well-crafted'' [[indemnity]]”===
===You keep saying “''well-crafted'' [[indemnity]]”===