Template:Ineligiblecreditsupport: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
On the face of it, it’s straightforward:  
On the face of it, it’s straightforward:  


:''the {{csaprov|Value}} of “any items that are comprised in a {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}} and are not {{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} is zero.”''
{{box|
''the {{csaprov|Value}} of “any items that are comprised in a {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}} and are not {{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} is zero.”''
:—Definition of {{csaprov|Value}}, {{tag|CSA}}
}}


So it doesn't count to the {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}}. But just because something has no “{{csaprov|Value}}” under your {{csaprov|CSA}} doesn't mean it has no value at all. There’s no accounting for taste, after all. If the {{csaprov|Transferee}} doesn't want it, it should give it back, right?
So it doesn't count to the {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}}. But just because something has no “{{csaprov|Value}}” under your {{csaprov|CSA}} doesn't mean it has no value at all. There’s no accounting for taste, after all. If the {{csaprov|Transferee}} doesn't want it, it should give it back, right?