Template:Isda 9(e) summ: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===Section {{{{{1}}}|9(e)(i)}} '''[[Counterpart]]s===
===Section {{{{{1}}}|9(e)(i)}} '''[[Counterpart]]s===


There is an impassioned essay about the idiocy of [[counterparts]] clauses elsewhere<ref>In the [[counterparts]] article, as a matter of fact.</ref>.  
There is an impassioned essay about the idiocy of [[counterparts]] clauses elsewhere<ref>In the [[counterparts]] article, as a matter of fact.</ref>. For now, just know this:
 
{{counterparts capsule}}
===Section {{{{{1}}}|9(e)(ii)}} {{{{{1}}}|Confirmation}}s===
===Section {{{{{1}}}|9(e)(ii)}} {{{{{1}}}|Confirmation}}s===
====Trade versus confirmation: celebrity death-match====
====Trade versus confirmation: celebrity death-match====
{{trade versus confirmation}}
{{trade versus confirmation}}
====Dare we mention ... ''[[email]]''?====
====Dare we mention ... ''[[email]]''?====
Note also the addition of [[e-mail]] as a means of communication to the {{2002ma}} ([[email]] not really having been a “thing” in 1992). This caused all kinds of [[fear and loathing]] among the judiciary, when asked about it, as can be seen in the frightful case of {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}.Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
Note also the addition of [[e-mail]] as a means of communication to the {{2002ma}} ([[email]] not really having been a “thing” in 1992). This caused all kinds of [[fear and loathing]] among the judiciary, when asked about it, as can be seen in the frightful case of {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}.Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.


==== [[Timely confirmation]] regulations and deemed consent====
==== [[Timely confirmation]] regulations and deemed consent====
Both {{t|EMIR}} and [[Dodd Frank]] have [[timely confirmation]] requirements obliging parties to have confirmed their scratchy tape recordings within a short period (around 3 days). This fell out of a huge backlog in confirming structured [[credit derivatives]] trades following the [[Lehman]] collapse.
Both {{t|EMIR}} and [[Dodd Frank]] have [[timely confirmation]] requirements obliging parties to have confirmed their scratchy tape recordings within a short period (around 3 days). This fell out of a huge backlog in confirming structured [[credit derivatives]] trades following the [[Lehman]] collapse.


====Roger Moore indahouse ====
====Roger Moore indahouse ====
Lastly, a rare opportunity to praise those maestros of legal word-wrangelry, {{icds}}. In Section {{{{{1}}}|9(e)(ii)}}, they contemplate that one might agree a {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} “[[orally or otherwise]]”. This is a smidgen wider than the usual [[legal eagle]] formulation of [[orally or in writing]]. It shows that while the swaps whizzes were conservative about how to [[close out]] a {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}, when putting one ''on'' you are constrained only by the bounds of your imagination and the limits of interpersonal ambiguity: not just [[In writing|written words]], nor even [[Oral|oral ones]], but the whole panoply of possible human communications: semaphore, naval flags, Morse code, waggled eyebrows, embarrassed smiles and any other kinds of physical gesture.
Lastly, a rare opportunity to praise those maestros of legal word-wrangelry, {{icds}}. In Section {{{{{1}}}|9(e)(ii)}}, they contemplate that one might agree a {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} “[[orally or otherwise]]”. This is a smidgen wider than the usual [[legal eagle]] formulation of [[orally or in writing]]. It shows that while the swaps whizzes were conservative about how to [[close out]] a {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}, when putting one ''on'' you are constrained only by the bounds of your imagination and the limits of interpersonal ambiguity: not just [[In writing|written words]], nor even [[Oral|oral ones]], but the whole panoply of possible human communications: semaphore, naval flags, Morse code, waggled eyebrows, embarrassed smiles and any other kinds of physical gesture.