Template:Isda Credit Support Provider summ: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A {{csa}} is not a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} at all, but a {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}. A {{nycsa}}, on the other hand, ''is'' a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} though. Should a Party to the {{isdama}}, where there is a {{nycsa}}, be described as a “{{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}"?
A {{csa}} is not a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} at all, but a {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}. A {{nycsa}}, on the other hand, ''is'' a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} though. Should a Party to the {{isdama}}, where there is a {{nycsa}}, be described as a “{{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}"?


'''No''', sayeth the Users' Guide to the {{1994csa}}:
'''No''', sayeth the Users’ Guide to the {{1994csa}}:


:“Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}s with respect to the Annex, ''as such term is intended only to apply to third parties''.”
:“Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}s with respect to the Annex, ''as such term is intended only to apply to third parties''.”
the Users’ Guide to the {{2002ma}} is similarly emphatically vague: “The meaning of “{{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}” ... should apply to any person or entity (''other than any either party'') providing , or a party to, a Credit Support Document delivered on behalf of a particular party.”
Does this mean that a {{nycsa}} is a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, but the person providing {{isdaprov|Credit Support}} under it is not a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}? Or not?


So that’s cleared that up, then.
So that’s cleared that up, then.