Template:Isda Credit Support Provider summ: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 12: Line 12:
{{quote|“The meaning of “{{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}” ... should apply to any person or entity (''other than either party'') providing, or a party to, a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} delivered on behalf of a particular party.”}}
{{quote|“The meaning of “{{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}” ... should apply to any person or entity (''other than either party'') providing, or a party to, a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} delivered on behalf of a particular party.”}}


This means that a {{nycsa}} is a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}}, but the person providing {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support}} under it — is not a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}? Or not?
This means that a New York Law CSA — which is not a {{{{{1}}}
 
|Transaction}} under the ISDA architecture, remember, ''is'' a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}}, but the person providing {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support}} under it — is ''not'' a {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}?
So that’s cleared that up, then.