Template:Isda Indemnifiable Tax comp: Difference between revisions

m
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Now you would like to think {{icds}} could do ''something'' to improve a passage with a [[quintuple negative]], wouldn’t you? Even, if, bloody-mindedly, to add a ''sixth'' negative, just to underline how scanty is the damn they give about the neurotic whinings of those, like the [[JC]] who hanker for more economical expression. [[In your face|In your ''face'']], [[prose stylist]]s, such a stance might say. Actually, since I’m here, have a fricking ''seventh'' negative, punk, and brand it on your forehead so all who look upon you will know who it was who ''schooled you''.
[[Indemnifiable Tax - ISDA Provision|Now]] you would like to think {{icds}} could do ''something'' to improve a passage with a [[quintuple negative]], wouldn’t you? Even, if, bloody-mindedly, to add a ''sixth'' negative, just to underline how scanty is the damn they give about the neurotic whinings of those, like the [[JC]] who hanker for more economical expression. [[In your face|In your ''face'']], [[prose stylist]]s, such a stance might say. Actually, since I’m here, have a fricking ''seventh'' negative, punk, and brand it on your forehead so all who look upon you will know who it was who ''schooled you''.


We can but dream, possums. We can only imagine what might have been. They left the ghastly tract inviolate.
We can but dream, possums. We can only imagine what might have been. but no; they left the ghastly tract inviolate.
 
But HAL 9000 is coming. The [[JC]] fed this language into the “OpenAI” text generator, and asked for a summary that a second grader (in old money, an eight-year-old) could understand and, well, the outcome is impressive:
{{quote|{{AI 2002 ISDA Indemnifiable Tax}}}}