Template:M comp disc 1992 ISDA 6(e)(i): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
:(iii) '''{{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} and {{isdaprov|Loss}} are needlessly inconsistent''': As noted above, for reasons best known to 1992’s {{icds}} (and look: it was a gentler, more naive time, when complexity for the sake of it was half the fun of derivatives practice) {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ''excludes'' {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}}, where as {{isdaprov|Loss}} ''includes'' them, and {{isdaprov|Loss}} is calculated in the {{isdaprov|Termination Currency Equivalent}}, whereas {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} is not.
:(iii) '''{{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} and {{isdaprov|Loss}} are needlessly inconsistent''': As noted above, for reasons best known to 1992’s {{icds}} (and look: it was a gentler, more naive time, when complexity for the sake of it was half the fun of derivatives practice) {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ''excludes'' {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}}, where as {{isdaprov|Loss}} ''includes'' them, and {{isdaprov|Loss}} is calculated in the {{isdaprov|Termination Currency Equivalent}}, whereas {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} is not.


The above in a nutshell: If you can’t see you r way clear to using a {{2002ma}} — and some Americans cannot — select "{{isdaprov|Second Method}} and {{isdaprov|Loss}}" and have done with it.
The above nutshell in a nutshell: If you can’t see your way clear to using a {{2002ma}} — and some Americans cannot — select {{isdaprov|Second Method}} and {{isdaprov|Loss}}and have done with it.